Safety standards for setting acceptable levels of nonionizing radiation have been established for operating frequencies to 3 GHz.1-3 While such standards cover a wide range of wireless devices, a growing number of consumer wireless devices operate in the range from 5 to 6 GHz, even in the absence of international testing standards. The key metric for assessing wireless devices used in proximity to the body is the specific absorption rate (SAR), which can be expressed in units of W/kg and for which limit standards for public exposure exist from 300 MHz to 3 GHz.1-3

As frequency increases, absorption in the body is characterized by a more intense, but shallower influence on body tissues related to the wavelength of the transmissions in such media. At 300 MHz, penetration depths are typically 50 mm. At 6 GHz, it is around 5 mm. Most recent attention on SAR measurements has been in the cellular range from 835 to 1900 MHz. SAR probes, with tip diameters from 5 to 8 mm, are small relative to the exposure volumes at these frequencies, and suitable for examining field variations within the layers close to the body surface. But at 5.8 GHz, which is used for IEEE 802.11a wireless local-area networks (WLANs), the penetration depth is only a few mm and current-generation SAR probes are no longer smaller relative to the exposure volumes. Although errors that arise from using "large" probes in field gradients have been assessed and a correction scheme has been advanced,4 the main avenue for improvement is by producing SAR probes of reduced dimensions for measurements at 5 to 6 GHz. Other procedural problems related to the use of complex equipment for testing at frequencies above 3 GHz arise in the calibration of SAR probes and in the methods used for validating measurement set-ups to ensure that answers obtained in testing are correct.

At frequencies below 3 GHz, the recommended procedures for validating SAR measurement systems involve the use of balanced dipoles positioned at fixed distances below flat (box-shaped) phantoms. In the 5-to-6-GHz band, however, it is reported that the use of suitable balanced dipoles becomes difficult due to the reduced manufacturing dimensions and the increased accuracy of positioning that is required.5 Solutions have been proposed by using open-ended waveguides5 spaced away from the phantoms as alternative irradiation sources, but we have found it difficult to obtain measurements meeting the proposed reference values.6

This study proposes modifications to the waveguide validation technique, which employs the same waveguide recommended for SAR probe calibrations.2,3 The waveguide are placed in direct contact with box phantoms using a dielectric matching window, which minimizes losses due to leakage and reflection and provides a reproducible geometry with minimal risk of misalignment.

A validation procedure has been defined utilising a flat phantom and a source based on the waveguide launcher with a dielectric matching window. This configuration has been modelled using the Falcon FDTD package at York University to establish reference values for key field parameters, which include the maximum 1-g or 10-g volume-averaged SAR values that should be obtained by measurement for a system validation.

The dimensions of the phantom used for the validation procedure are pre-defined by the requirements of the relevant standards for SAR assessment.1-3 At test frequencies above 3 GHz, the phantoms do not need to be sized on account of the frequency—rather on account of the dimensions of the devices being tested (or at least their active parts). The configuration used for this study is shown in Fig. 1. The rectangular box phantom is more than adequately sized for the test frequencies involved. Potentially, different matching windows could be used for different frequencies in the band as shown in Fig. 1, but a single matching window of 5.2-mm thickness was selected for the tests reported here.

Version 1.6 of the York University Falcon FDTD package was used for this study. This package has been validated against COST 244 benchmarks where the results fall in the midrange. The model has previously been applied to several studies closely related to the present application.7-9 The waveguide and box model was set up according to Fig. 1.

A relative permittivity of 2.56 was used for the 2-mm-thick phantom base. A uniform grid with a voxel size of 0.5 mm was used (less than one-tenth of the wavelength in the lossy liquid). The computations extended for a depth of 35 mm into the liquid and 85 × 65 mm laterally. The conducting waveguide walls were nominally considered to be lossy with realistic conductivity values used. A "monopole" excitation source was used with the length varied to give a match with 50-Ω source impedance. The time step was determined by voxel size and stability condition. A time duration of 8.34 ns was used with a time step of 0.834 ps. The computations typically took 2 h on a personal computer running the Windows 2000 operating system.

Since waveguide dimensions scale inversely with frequency, waveguide dimensions, which are impractically large at 300 MHz, are on the limit of being too small compared with probe tip dimensions above 5 GHz. Two different waveguide types have been referenced in previous work on SAR probe calibration and validation above 5 GHz. The ridged waveguide WR187 in ref. 5 has the advantage of slightly larger linear dimensions. On the downside, it is not one recommended for SAR probe calibration2 and matching window designs for the 5-to-6-GHz band have not been published. Dimensions for each are in Table 1.

The waveguide selected for this study is the slightly smaller WG13 type, listed in the recommendations for higher-frequency probe calibrations13 and for which matching window parameters are suggested. The objective here is to reduce the component count required for SAR evaluation by using the same items for both probe calibration and system validation.

Page Title

The selection of tissue-simulant liquid formulations for the 5-to-6-GHz band is not without complications. It has proved hard to achieve the required property values2,13 using simple sugar/salt/water formulations. Fortunately, advances in simulant-liquid formulations achieved by Bristol University have enabled stable liquids with the desired properties to be obtained.11 The liquid used for this study was a brain tissue simulant liquid produced by Bristol University with the measured properties at 5.2 and 5.8 GHz listed in Table 2 where requirements from ref. 13 are also shown.

Property values and dimensions for suitable matching windows have been presented in ref. 13, although the recommendations have changed markedly between different drafts of the document. In preparation for this study, two approaches were used for matching window design. The first was a pragmatic experimental approach of testing windows having different dimensions and determining the dimensions for optimum return loss. Windows of 5.3 and 4.4 mm were made from Eccostock (K = 6.0) dielectric material from Emerson & Cuming Microwave Products (Randolph, MA). The second approach was to perform computations to predict the optimum dimensions (Fig. 2) on the basis of maximising the SAR generated in the phantom and minimising the return signal.

Computations and measurements were performed at 5.2 and 5.8 GHz and the results compared. The measurements rely upon calibration of the SAR probes in similar waveguides using matching windows, where the calibration is effected by matching measured E-field profiles with those derived from analytical computation. At the small penetration depths of the 5-to-6-GHz frequency band, it is essential to deduce boundary correction factors from the waveguide calibration stage and use them to correct the measurement results for the effects of surface proximity.10

Measurements were performed using two types of Indexsar SAR probes having tip diameters of 5 and 3 mm. The validation measurement results obtained compare with reference values acceptably with both probe sizes.

In both the calibration and the measurement phase, accurate determination of the liquid dielectric properties is required and, in this study, recent advances made in both liquid formulations11 and in dielectric property measurement techniques12 have been exploited to reduce the uncertainties in the overall calibration and validation cycles. By a combination of the results, the dimensions and dielectric properties in Table 3 were selected. For convenience, one window was used for both frequencies although this involved some compromise. Two SAR probes having differing tip dimensions were selected for use and calibrated in the WG13 waveguide using Bristol brain liquid.11 The tip dimensions for each are given in Table 4. The procedures used for the probes follows those recommended in refs. 2 and 3. A typical comparison of the measured and analytical centreline profiles is shown in Fig. 3.

Part 2 of this article will appear next month, in the April 2005 issue of Microwaves & RF.

REFERENCES

  1. EN50361 Basic Standard for the Measurement of Specific Absorption Rate related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones (300 MHz — 3 GHz), July 2001.
  2. IEEE Standard 1528-2003: "Recommended practice for determining the peak spatial-average absorption rate (SAR) in the human head from wireless communications devices: Measurement techniques."
  3. IEC 62209 Procedure to measure the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for hand-held mobile wireless devices in the frequency range of 300 MHz to 3 GHz.
  4. M.I. Manning, "Compensating for the finite size of SAR probes used in electric field gradients," Indexsar Report IXS0223, May 16, 2003.
  5. Q. Li, O.P. Gandhi and G. Kang, "An open-ended waveguide system for SAR system validation and/or probe calibration for frequencies above 3 GHz," submitted to IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, September 2003.
  6. K Radley, personal communication.
  7. F.D. Faraci, S.J. Porter, M.H. Capstick, I.D. Flintoft, and A.C. Marvin, "Efficient Modelling of Antennas for Exposure Assessment of Devices used in Close Proximity to the Human Body," Biological Effects of EMFs 3rd International Workshop, Kos, Greece, October, 4-8, 2004, ISBN: 9602331518, Vol. 1, preprint No. A3:1, pp. 145-154.
  8. S.J. Porter, M.H. Capstick, F. Faraci, I.D. Flintoft, and A.C. Marvin, "SAR and induced current measurements on wired hands-free mobile telephones," IEE Technical Seminar on Antenna Measurements and SAR, University of Loughborough, UK, May, 2004. ISBN: 086341415X, pp. 9-13 and 25-26.
  9. S.J. Porter, M.H. Capstick, F. Faraci, I.D. Flintoft, and A.C. Marvin, "SAR associated with the use of hands-free mobile telephones," EMC Europe 2004, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, September 6-10, 2004, preprint No. B10.
  10. K. Pokovic, "Advanced Electromagnetic Probes for Near Field Evaluation," Doc. Tech. Sci. Diss. ETH Nr. 13334, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland, 1999.
  11. A.P. Gregory, Y. Johnson, K. Fukanaga, R.N. Clarke, and A.W. Preece, "New liquids for the measurement of specific absorption rate in the frequency range 300 MHz to 6 GHz," EMMA club meeting, January 26-27, 2004.
  12. Indexsar "DiLine" implementation of TEM Line method referenced in A Toropainen et al., Electronic Letters, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2000, pp. 32-34.
  13. Annex X: Frequency Extension to 3 GHz — 6 GHz of IEEE Standard 1528-200X: "Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques. First and Second Drafts."
  14. D.V. Blackham and R.D. Pollard, "An improved technique for permittivity measurements using a coaxial probe," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 46, No. 5, 1997, pp. 1093-1098.
  15. US Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Supplement C (Edition 01-01) to OET Bulletin 65 (Edition 97 — 01), "Additional Information for Evaluating Compliance of Mobile and Portable Devices with FCC Limits for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation," June 2001.