Latest from Communications

Dreamstime_busakorn-pongparnit_98343612
dreamstime_busakornpongparnit_98343612
Dreamstime_Tero-Vesalainen_125737781
dreamstime_terovesalainen_125737781
ID 368300897 © Anastasiia Torianyk | Dreamstime.com
0625mwrf_psemi_ims_promo
ID 324659672 © Dzmitry Skazau | Dreamstime.com
satellite_dreamstime_m_324659672
Constellation Technologies & Operations | European Space Agency
demay272_promo
Dreamstime_dezzor_132219382
67c0d15603eeae1a25407a86 Satellite Dreamstime Dezzor 132219382

Saving SWaP in Payload-Borne Phased Arrays with Multibeam Beamformers (Download)

Feb. 27, 2025
Log in to download the PDF of this article on how multibeam beamforming ICs can deliver low-power, high levels of functionality and scale with mission requirements.

Read this article online.

Most common satellite communications were once based on geostationary (GEO) satellites, when only three satellites were required for global coverage. Then, launch vehicles would typically carry only one of these large satellites (>1,000 kg). While such deployments were beneficial for broadcast applications in television and radio, there were limitations.

One limitation is the latency involved in communications imposed by the great distance between the user and the satellite. Typical GEO orbits are near 36,000 km, which has an approximate end-to-end latency of 400 ms, approximately 10X higher than point-to-point fiber-optic connections in the United States. Secondly, while the GEO satellite covers much of the Earth, it can’t effectively cover its northern or southern poles. As an example, Inmarsat’s Global Xpress GEO satellites cover approximately ±75° off the equator.