1. The zero-power switch interface uses the changes in Wi-Fi RF backscatter which occurs with small-scale motion of plastic, 3D-printed objects having embedded, conductive filaments. (Source: University of Washington)
The researchers’ detailed-yet-highly-readable paper, “3D Printing Wireless Connected Objects,” published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, explains the concept, shows the many test widgets they built, and details range of tests they conducted. The team demonstrated that its approach allows for the detection of simple actions such as a mechanical on/off switch being activated.
Furthermore, the magnetic properties of the ferromagnetic plastic material can also be used to encode up to 12 bits in a short stream of encoded in the widget, which could be sensed and decoded using a smartphone-based maglink receiver. Data rates were on the order of 10 bits/sec (slow, but sufficient for the application) over distances in the tens of cm range (again, adequate for many IoT applications).
Key to the detection technique is use of backscatter, the pattern that a receiver sees due to conductive objects in an RF field. When an object moves or changes shape, the backscatter signal is affected, and this change can be detected and demodulated. (Backscatter is somewhat like radar, which relies on an intentional transmit pulse and received echo.) To make the team’s technique work well, each 3D printed widget incorporates a reflecting antenna (dipole or bowtie) to enhance the distinctions in the backscatter signal among its positions.
For example, the team built several very different versions of a basic on/off switch. In one design, the switch replicates the action of a pushbutton using a cantilever separating spring element (Fig. 2). It uses a planar spring built as a 1 mm thick spiral structure, with the outer edges of the spiral fixed to a rectangular case, and increased the contact area of the switch by 100× to improve the difference in backscatter radar cross section. The integral bowtie antenna has a relatively wide beam width and greater bandwidth than a dipole, thus making it more resilient to fabrication error.